|
Few people are aware that in the eighteenth century,
India almost became a French rather than British territory.
Fewer know that France nevertheless managed to retain a
foothold in the subcontinent throughout the raj.
They are surprised to discover that French India survived
for a full fifteen years after the Union Jack was lowered in
Delhi. And they are amazed to find out that, as a legacy of
France’s colonial rule in India, there remain today
scattered throughout the Union Territory of Pondicherry,
thousands of ethnic Indians who nevertheless retain French
citizenship.
Older Frenchmen recognize -- even better than most Indian
students and adults do -- the places named Karikal, Mahe, and
Yanam. These small settlements, along with the larger and
better-known towns of Pondicherry and Chandernagore,
constituted the five comptoirs or establishments of French
India. Today, these specks of former French India (with the
exception of Chandernagore) constitute the Union Territory of
Pondicherry. Only colonial history can explain why such small
pieces of territory, which otherwise would be part of the
states of Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and Andhra Pradesh, are
administratively united.
In 1954, after a local vote carried out under dubious
circumstances, France physically withdrew from her four
remaining establishments in India. (She had already ceded
Chandernagore under more amicable terms in 1949.) Between 1954
and 1962, former French India subsisted in juridical limbo.
Though administered by the Indian government, France retained
a legal fiction of sovereignty. This ambiguous position came
to an end in 1962 when the government of France ratified a
1956 treaty with India relinquishing all territorial claims.
As a result of this treaty, however, the constituent parts of
former French India were to remain united as a single
administrative unit within the Union of India.
An even more intriguing part of that Treaty of Cession
stipulated that inhabitants of the former French
establishments could opt to retain French citizenship.
Relatively few of the inhabitants of French India did so and
today they and their dependents and offspring number perhaps
twenty-five thousand. Many of these are recipients
(particularly as army veterans) of pensions and other French
government transfer payments. France’s mode of
decolonization in India created a countercolonial situation in
which the former colonizer pays a much higher price today than
do the formerly colonized. The ensuing complications run the
gamut from education to economics, from nationality to
neo-colonialism, and from politics to procreation.
One such legacy is the maintenance of different French
language school systems, catering to ethnic Indians on Indian
soil. The systems are maintained by the Indian government
(through the union territory budget), private religious
institutions (mostly Catholic), and the French government
(through the ministry of foreign affairs). But what can one do
with a French language diploma in India? French language
education results in migration to France, a fairly easy
prospect for those holding French citizenship but a great
difficulty for those without it. (The Indian government does
not recognize dual citizenship.) French colonialism in India
has created one of South Asia’s most fascinating political
subcultures.
Editor’s
Note: William Miles, Ph.D., is the author of “Imperial
Burdens: Countercolonialism in Former French India.” He
teaches political science at Boston’s Northeastern
University.
|